• /
  • EnglishEspañolFrançais日本語한국어Português
  • Se connecterDémarrer

Level 3 - Service level attainment scorecard rule

Service level attainment measures whether your services consistently meet their defined Service Level Objectives (SLOs), demonstrating operational excellence and the business value of your observability practices. This represents the pinnacle of mature observability programs.

About this scorecard rule

This service level attainment rule is part of Level 3 (Mastery) in the business uptime maturity model. It evaluates whether your services are meeting their reliability targets, indicating that your observability practice delivers measurable business outcomes.

Why this matters: Consistent SLO attainment demonstrates that your observability investments translate into reliable services that customers can depend on. This level of performance excellence drives customer satisfaction, business growth, and competitive advantage.

How this rule works

This rule evaluates the latest service level compliance score for each defined SLI in your account. It measures whether your services are meeting their SLO targets over the defined time periods.

Understanding your score

  • Pass (Green): Services consistently meet their SLOs with 95% or higher compliance rates
  • Fail (Red): One or more services fall below the 95% SLO compliance threshold
  • Target: All critical services achieving 95%+ SLO compliance, demonstrating reliable service delivery

What this means:

  • Passing score: Your services deliver consistent, reliable performance that meets user expectations and business requirements
  • Failing score: Service reliability issues are impacting user experience and potentially affecting business outcomes

Understanding the 95% threshold

The 95% SLO compliance threshold represents a balance between reliability and operational efficiency:

Why 95%?

  • Industry standard: Aligns with common industry practices for high-availability services
  • Error budget concept: Allows for 5% failure rate, providing flexibility for maintenance, deployments, and unexpected issues
  • Business impact: Typically represents the reliability level where customer satisfaction remains high
  • Operational sustainability: Achievable without excessive operational overhead or costs

When to adjust the threshold

  • Higher requirements (99%+): Mission-critical systems, financial services, healthcare applications
  • Lower requirements (90-94%): Internal tools, experimental features, cost-sensitive applications
  • Variable thresholds: Different targets for different service tiers or user segments

How to improve service level attainment

If your score shows SLO compliance issues, follow this systematic approach:

1. Identify underperforming services

Analyze SLO violations:

  1. Review compliance trends: Look at which services consistently miss SLO targets
  2. Identify patterns: Determine if violations occur at specific times, during deployments, or under certain conditions
  3. Assess impact: Understand which SLO misses have the greatest business or user impact
  4. Prioritize improvements: Focus first on services with highest business criticality and largest SLO gaps

Use data-driven analysis:

  • Error budget burn rate: Track how quickly services consume their allowed failure budget
  • Time-series analysis: Identify trends in SLO performance over time
  • Correlation analysis: Look for relationships between SLO violations and other events (deployments, traffic spikes, infrastructure changes)

2. Investigate root causes

Technical factors:

  • Infrastructure issues: Capacity constraints, hardware failures, network problems
  • Application bugs: Performance regressions, memory leaks, inefficient algorithms
  • Deployment problems: Bad releases, configuration errors, rollback issues
  • Dependency failures: Third-party service outages, database performance, API rate limits

Operational factors:

  • Monitoring gaps: Insufficient observability leading to delayed problem detection
  • Incident response: Slow resolution times due to poor processes or tooling
  • Change management: Inadequate testing or deployment practices
  • Capacity planning: Insufficient resources during peak usage periods

3. Implement targeted improvements

Immediate actions:

  • Fix critical issues: Address any ongoing problems causing SLO violations
  • Optimize performance: Tune database queries, improve caching, optimize resource usage
  • Enhance monitoring: Add more detailed observability to identify issues faster
  • Improve incident response: Streamline processes to reduce mean time to resolution

Strategic improvements:

  • Architecture enhancements: Implement redundancy, improve scalability, reduce dependencies
  • Automation: Deploy auto-scaling, self-healing systems, automated recovery procedures
  • Quality practices: Enhance testing, implement canary deployments, improve code review
  • Capacity management: Better resource planning, proactive scaling, performance testing

4. Optimize SLOs and SLIs

Review SLO appropriateness:

  • Business alignment: Ensure SLOs reflect actual business requirements and user expectations
  • Achievability: Verify that SLOs are realistic given current technology and resource constraints
  • Measurability: Confirm that SLIs accurately capture the user experience being measured

Refine SLI definitions:

  • User focus: Ensure SLIs measure what users actually experience, not just technical metrics
  • Actionability: Verify that SLI violations lead to clear, actionable improvement opportunities
  • Sensitivity: Adjust SLI thresholds to catch meaningful issues without excessive noise

Measuring improvement

Track these metrics to verify your service level attainment improvements:

  • SLO compliance rate: Percentage of services meeting their 95% reliability targets
  • Error budget utilization: How efficiently services use their allowed failure budget
  • Improvement velocity: Rate at which underperforming services achieve compliance
  • Business impact correlation: Relationship between SLO attainment and business metrics (customer satisfaction, revenue, churn)

Common scenarios and solutions

Consistently missing SLOs despite effort:

  • Problem: Some services seem unable to reach reliability targets
  • Solution: Reassess SLO targets for realism, investigate fundamental architecture issues, or consider accepting lower reliability for less critical services

SLO violations during deployment windows:

  • Problem: Releases consistently cause SLO breaches
  • Solution: Implement blue-green deployments, improve testing practices, use canary releases, or adjust SLOs to account for planned maintenance

External dependency failures affecting SLOs:

  • Problem: Third-party services cause SLO violations outside your control
  • Solution: Implement circuit breakers, fallback mechanisms, redundant providers, or exclude external dependency failures from SLO calculations

Seasonal or cyclical SLO violations:

  • Problem: Services fail SLOs during predictable peak periods
  • Solution: Implement proactive scaling, capacity planning, or create time-based SLO targets that account for known traffic patterns

Advanced service level management

Error budget policies

Establish clear policies:

  • Budget exhaustion response: What happens when services exceed their error budget
  • Deployment freezes: When to halt releases due to reliability concerns
  • Resource allocation: How to prioritize reliability work vs. feature development

Implement budget tracking:

  • Real-time monitoring: Track error budget consumption throughout measurement periods
  • Predictive alerting: Warn when services are on track to exhaust budgets
  • Historical analysis: Learn from past budget utilization patterns

Business impact measurement

Connect SLOs to business outcomes:

  • Customer satisfaction: Correlate SLO attainment with customer surveys and feedback
  • Revenue impact: Measure how SLO violations affect sales, conversions, and customer retention
  • Operational efficiency: Track how reliable services reduce support burden and operational costs

Demonstrate ROI:

  • Cost of downtime: Calculate business impact of SLO violations
  • Investment justification: Use SLO data to support reliability improvement investments
  • Stakeholder reporting: Provide executives with clear reliability metrics tied to business value

Continuous improvement practices

Regular SLO review cycles:

  • Quarterly assessments: Evaluate SLO appropriateness and achievement rates
  • Annual planning: Set reliability goals aligned with business strategy
  • Post-incident reviews: Update SLOs based on lessons learned from outages

Cultural integration:

  • Team accountability: Make SLO attainment part of team goals and performance reviews
  • Cross-functional collaboration: Ensure development, operations, and business teams align on reliability targets
  • Reliability advocacy: Champion reliability as a feature throughout the organization

Building organizational maturity

Executive reporting

Create business-focused dashboards:

  • Service health overview: High-level view of all critical service SLO status
  • Trend analysis: Show improvement or degradation patterns over time
  • Business impact metrics: Connect reliability to customer and revenue metrics

Regular stakeholder communication:

  • Monthly reliability reports: Summary of SLO performance and improvement initiatives
  • Incident impact analysis: Business context for major reliability issues
  • Investment recommendations: Data-driven proposals for reliability improvements

Team development

Build reliability expertise:

  • SRE practices training: Educate teams on error budgets, SLO management, and reliability engineering
  • Cross-team knowledge sharing: Share successful reliability practices across the organization
  • External learning: Attend conferences, engage with industry reliability communities

Establish reliability culture:

  • Reliability as a feature: Treat reliability with the same priority as new features
  • Shared responsibility: Make reliability everyone's responsibility, not just operations
  • Celebration of reliability wins: Recognize teams and individuals who improve service reliability

Important considerations

  • Balance reliability with innovation: Don't let perfectionist reliability targets slow product development
  • Focus on user impact: Prioritize SLOs that truly affect customer experience over internal technical metrics
  • Evolutionary approach: Allow SLOs to evolve as services mature and business requirements change
  • Tool and process integration: Ensure SLO management integrates with existing development and operations workflows

Next steps

  1. Immediate action: Address any services currently failing SLO compliance through root cause analysis and targeted improvements
  2. Process optimization: Establish regular SLO review cycles and error budget management practices
  3. Business integration: Connect SLO attainment to business metrics and stakeholder reporting
  4. Cultural development: Build organizational commitment to reliability as a competitive advantage
  5. Continuous evolution: Regularly assess and improve your service level management practices

For comprehensive guidance on advanced service level management, see our Service Level Management implementation guide and SRE best practices documentation.

Droits d'auteur © 2025 New Relic Inc.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.